Defective Products Injury Cases
Defective Products Injury Cases: When products are defective in some way and cause injury, the aggrieved party may be able to seek damages under a theory of negligence or under a breach of warranty (which can be “express” [spelled out usually in writing] or “implied” [based upon certain laws that presume a guarantee of certain products]). The other theory that is often used under certain circumstances is the legal theory of “Strict Liability” (i.e. that the party should be responsible whether or not they acted or failed to act reasonably or whether or not they breached any warranties or guarantees regarding the item). How does this work?
What is the Legal Definition of a “Product”? Believe it or not, the legal definition of a “product” can be much broader than what we normally think of as commodities sitting on a shelf for sale in a store. It can include documents, real estate, homes, buildings, electricity and other utilities, blood and human tissue, medical devices, cars, construction equipment, tools, manufacturing elements, fixtures and many other things.
Who can be Sued for a Faulty Commodity, Invention or Device? Although each case is different, the potential “defendants” (people or businesses against whom a claim may be made) can include the original manufacturer of the overall produce, fabricators of components of the item, companies that distribute or sell the concoction, and even the ultimate retailer. This means that persons may be held responsible if they invented, distributed or sold the items in question at any point in the chain.
Who can Bring a Cause of Action for Defects? The laws of the State of California are much like other states in this regard and, in some respects, more liberally interpreted. Any person injured by a product may be able to bring a claim whether or not they were the original purchaser of the goods. For example, both the driver / owner of a motor vehicle and the passengers may bring a claim if the automobile (or any of its components such as tires, brakes, ignition systems, etc.) were not functioning as they should and this caused them to be maimed or killed.
What are the Three Main Types of Faults in Manufactured Items? - DESIGN: The item fails to perform as an ordinary consumer would expect when used for its intended purpose or if the product’s structure caused someone to be injured and the benefits of the instrument are outweighed by the risk inherent in the construction.
- MANUFACTURING: Even if the architecture of the item is sound but, the way it was made is faulty, a claim may lie.
- FAILURE TO WARN: If the apparatus was safely designed and made but, has dangers for which the maker or distributor failed to warn, a claim may also lie.
The bottom line is that many different items (like toys, cribs, bikes, cars, boats, accessories, medical implants, instruments, and construction tools) cause various afflictions every year to the young and the old alike. These cases must be analyzed by attorneys familiar with the law and experts to reconstruct the development of the item from initial planning through sale to determine if a valid petition for monetary compensation can be made.
For more information on various recalls and other information on product defects go to the Consumer Products Safety Commission website.
Client Reviews
★★★★★
I have known Steven for some time now and when his services were required he jumped in and took control of my cases. I had two and they were handled with the utmost professionalism and courtesy. He went the extra mile regardless of the bumps in the road. I can not see me using any other attorney and I would recommend him to any of my family and friends. Josie A.
★★★★★
Steven was vital during our most trying time. He was referred by a friend after an accident that involved a family member. While he was critical and lying in the hospital, Steven was kind, patient and knowledgeable about what we were going through. Following our loss, Steven became a tough and aggressive negotiator and made sure that we receive a huge compensation. I would refer Steven in fact, this happened 2 years ago and I still speak highly of his service. Cheryl S.
★★★★★
Mr. Sweat is a pitbull in the courtroom as well as settlement negotiations - You can't have a better equipped attorney in your corner! It is a pleasure working as colleagues together on numerous cases. He can get the job done. Jonathan K.
★★★★★
Because of Steven Sweat, my medical support was taken care of. Plus, I had more money to spare for my other bills. Steven is not only an excellent personal injury lawyer, providing the best legal advice, but also a professional lawyer who goes beyond his call of duty just to help his clients! He stood up for me and helped me get through the process. I would definitely recommend. I couldn't think of any better lawyer than him. MiraJane C.
★★★★★
I must tell anyone, if you need a great attorney, Steve sweat is the guy! I had an awful car accident and had no idea where to turn. He had so much to deal with because my accident was a 4 car pile up. Not to mention all the other cars were behind me and they were not wanting to settle in any way! He never stopped working for me and had my best interest at heart! Audra W.
★★★★★
I believe I made the best choice with Steven M Sweat, Personal Injury. I was very reluctant to go forward with my personal injury claim. I had a valid claim and I needed a professional attorney to handle it. I felt so much better when I let Steven take my case. His team did everything right and I am very satisfied. Stia P.
★★★★★
I have to say that Steve has been exemplary! I met Steve at a point with my case that I was ready to give up. He took the time and dealt with all of my concerns. Most importantly, he was present and listened to what I was going through. He was able to turn things around, put me and my case on the right track! The results were better that expected! Highly recommend!! Cody A.